{"id":33717,"title":"Adidas seeking ‘monopoly’ on stripes, New York designer tells London court","publisher":"Stockmark.IT","author":"Stockmark.IT Website","published":"2024-07-18T04:30:57+00:00","modified":"2024-07-18T04:30:57+00:00","canonical_url":"https://stockmark.it/adidas-seeking-monopoly-on-stripes-new-york-designer-tells-london-court/","markdown_url":"https://stockmark.it/adidas-seeking-monopoly-on-stripes-new-york-designer-tells-london-court.md","json_url":"https://stockmark.it/adidas-seeking-monopoly-on-stripes-new-york-designer-tells-london-court.json","category":"Fashion","categories":["Fashion"],"featured_image":"https://i0.wp.com/stockmark.it/wp-content/uploads/stencil.default-2024-07-18T053041.121.jpg?fit=1200%2C800&quality=89&ssl=1","format":"news","language":"en-GB","content":"In a London court battle with luxury brand Thom Browne, Adidas was accused of trying to establish a “monopoly on clothing featuring stripes” by threatening fashion designers’ creative freedom.\n\nThe New York designer and the sportswear group faced off at the High Court in Wednesday’s latest round of the long-running dispute about stacks of stripes that are printed on items like hoodies or T-shirts.\n\nThom Browne’s clothes, which feature a four stripe motif, are being sued by Adidas to invalidate the trademarks that cover its three-stripe symbol.\n\nAdidas countersues the fashion brand. It alleges that the seller of high-end clothing, including grey suits for men worn sometimes with shorts, has violated its trademarks.\n\nLawyers for Adidas told the court that the similarities between the logo, the “iconic identifier”, of their brand and the solid bars employed by the US firm were “obvious”.\n\nPhilip Roberts KC representing Thom Browne said Adidas “sought monopolise”, an “abstract generalisation” or “conceptualisation of the three stripes”.\n\nHe continued: “The extent of Adidas’ claimed monopoly threatens fashion designers’ basic freedom to design clothes in the way they choose.”\n\nBrowne wore his trademark suit and shorts into the courtroom where the judge was able to inspect about twenty garments. Browne is considered one of the most influential fashion designers in the last two decades. His garments were worn by celebrities such as basketball player LeBron and David Bowie.\n\nThom Browne was launched in New York in 2001 as a small shop “by appointment”. Initially, the clothing featured a three bar motif. The company, which is now part of the Italian family controlled Ermenegildo Zegna Group, has said that it agreed to add a four-bar motif after Adidas complained in 2007.\n\nAdidas filed a lawsuit against Thom Browne in the US and EU in 2021 after it had opposed several trademark applications by Thom Browne in 2018. Last year, a New York jury ruled in favor of Thom Browne.\n\nRoberts wrote in his written arguments that “no other company should have to make the same invidious decision between giving up and spending millions on defending themselves” as Thom Browne did.\n\nHe added that despite the millions of dollars spent by Adidas both on the Atlantic and the Pacific, there was no evidence of consumer confusion or deception.\n\nHe said that Thom Browne fabrics and tailoring are “of a different order” than Adidas’ mass-market products. However, the judge, Ms Justice Joanna Smith questioned the relevance of quality in the trademark dispute.\n\nCharlotte May KC for Adidas said that in written arguments, there were evidences from members of the public who “have assumed that Adidas is responsible or behind goods” with Thom Browne’s sign.\n\nShe said that Adidas’ “tipping-point” had arrived in 2020 when Thom Browne released a line of sportswear “that strikes at the core” of the company."}