Apple Removes Advanced Data Protection Tool From British Users Over Government Privacy Dispute

In a significant development, Apple has withdrawn its highest level of data security protection from UK customers following a contentious dispute with the British government. The tech giant’s decision to remove the “advanced data protection” (ADP) tool marks a notable escalation in tensions between big tech and government surveillance powers.

The removal comes after the Home Office demanded comprehensive access to view fully encrypted material uploaded by global users onto Apple’s iCloud software, leveraging new evidence-collection powers. Rather than creating a “back door” in its encryption service, Apple opted to completely disable ADP for British customers.

The timing proves particularly sensitive as it precedes Sir Keir Starmer’s scheduled Washington visit to meet President Trump amid growing regulatory friction between the UK and US tech sectors. JD Vance, US vice-president, has expressed concerns about European governments’ increasing pressure on American technology companies.

Intelligence and law enforcement agencies have supported the government’s strict approach, emphasising the need to prevent criminal exploitation of encrypted platforms. Sources within law enforcement stress they seek targeted access rather than mass surveillance, requiring warrants approved by the home secretary for specific investigations.

Apple’s stance remains firm on user privacy, with the company stating it is “gravely disappointed” about the UK situation. While 14 types of data stored on iCloud will maintain end-to-end encryption, including health information and communication tools like iMessage and FaceTime, the broader implications for data security have raised concerns among privacy advocates.

The decision highlights the growing tension between national security interests and digital privacy rights. Privacy campaign groups warn this could establish a concerning precedent, potentially making the UK a weak link in global cybersecurity standards. Children’s safety campaigners, however, argue that robust encryption can shield criminal activities from detection.