
Corporate Travel Management, an Australian travel company headquartered in Brisbane, has admitted to overcharging British clients at least £80 million over the past three years. The revelation exposes significant financial irregularities within a firm that has secured £3.9 billion in public sector contracts since 2015, raising serious questions about government procurement practices and financial oversight.
The Home Office emerged as CTM’s largest UK government client, awarding nine contracts valued at £2.4 billion, including the controversial Bibby Stockholm asylum accommodation barge anchored off Portland in Dorset. The Scottish government awarded seven contracts totalling £421.9 million, whilst the Department for Work and Pensions provided six contracts worth £209 million. Additional significant contracts flowed from the Ministry of Defence at £190 million and the Environment Agency at £100 million, according to analysis compiled from government procurement databases.
The scale of government reliance on CTM intensified during the previous Conservative administration. Former Home Secretary Suella Braverman awarded a £1.6 billion contract for the Bibby Stockholm in 2023, cementing CTM’s position as a critical supplier for asylum accommodation services. The current Labour government initially cancelled the barge contract following its election victory in July 2024, yet subsequently awarded CTM a £550 million contract in March to operate fourteen asylum hotels on the south coast, citing superior value for money compared to competing bids.
Trading in CTM’s shares on the Australian Stock Exchange has remained suspended since August following disclosure of the financial scandal. The company’s chairman, Ewen Crouch, issued formal apologies to affected UK clients but warned that KPMG’s forensic audit could identify additional undisclosed overcharges requiring repayment. Michael Healy, CTM’s UK and European chief executive, was initially suspended before the company announced his termination for alleged breach of contractual obligations.
The Cabinet Office confirmed awareness of CTM’s accounting irregularities and stated it was engaged in discussions with the company to investigate the matter. However, officials declined to disclose further details whilst this process remained ongoing. The Home Office launched a separate investigation in December 2024 to determine whether taxpayer funds had been misappropriated through the overcharging scheme.
Beyond central government departments, numerous local authorities had awarded substantial contracts to CTM. Liverpool City Council paid £40 million, City of London Corporation issued contracts worth £8.5 million, and Essex County Council provided £4.5 million. The Greater London Authority made payments totalling £497,000 since December 2023, though no formal published contract existed for this arrangement according to procurement research by Tussell Research.
CTM expanded its government service provision during the COVID-19 pandemic, securing hotel quarantine contracts and asylum accommodation arrangements that proved highly profitable for the UK and Europe division. This revenue stream represented one of the company’s most significant growth areas in recent years, contributing substantially to profitability despite the now-revealed accounting deficiencies.
The scandal raises fundamental concerns regarding government procurement processes and the adequacy of financial due diligence applied to major contract awards. The magnitude of contracts awarded without detecting systematic overcharging suggests potential weaknesses in contract management and independent financial oversight mechanisms. Stakeholders including analysts and hedge fund operators have questioned CTM’s capacity to remit full repayment to affected UK clients given the company’s current financial position and suspension from stock exchange trading.
The following content has been published by Stockmark.IT. All information utilised in the creation of this communication has been gathered from publicly available sources that we consider reliable. Nevertheless, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this communication.
This communication is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer, recommendation, solicitation, inducement, or invitation by or on behalf of the Company or any affiliates to engage in any investment activities. The opinions and views expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Company, its affiliates, or any other third party.
The services and products mentioned in this communication may not be suitable for all recipients, by continuing to read this website and its content you agree to the terms of this disclaimer.






