British Food Producers Face Financial Strain Following PostBrexit Import Check Delays

British food and flower suppliers have incurred millions of pounds in losses due to delays in post-Brexit import checks. The industry had been preparing for the implementation of full sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) controls on agri-food imports from the European Union, with expectations set for a July 2025 start. However, a recent shift in government policy has postponed the majority of these checks indefinitely, leaving businesses in an uncertain position.

The Fresh Produce Consortium, which represents key players in the supply of fruit, vegetables, and flowers, expressed concern over short-notice policy revisions. Industry leaders have criticised the government for inadequate communication and contradictory measures, which have severely undermined business confidence. Many companies have already invested substantial amounts of money to build infrastructure capable of meeting the anticipated inspection requirements.

Nigel Jenney, Chief Executive of the Fresh Produce Consortium, stated that the delay puts companies in limbo, with no clear timeline for regulatory changes. Mike Parr, Chief Executive of PML Seafrigo, echoed these frustrations, revealing that his company invested more than £7 million in developing a dedicated customs facility for managing perishable imports. He argued that such investments may now never see a return due to shifting government priorities.

These delays come amidst broader economic challenges caused by Brexit-related red tape. Experts at the Centre for Inclusive Trade Policy highlight that British goods exports to the EU have declined by 16 per cent since Brexit, attributed to customs complexities, regulatory divergence, and border delays. The fresh produce sector has been one of the hardest hit, with increased financial strain on suppliers and logistics companies alike.

The postponement of SPS checks forms part of the government’s strategy to ease post-Brexit trade friction and tackle food inflation through better relations with the EU. However, the lack of clarity on regulatory timelines has diminished trust within the industry. Concerns have also been raised about future controls on non-EU food imports, as the UK remains one of the largest importers of fresh produce globally.

For traders reliant on EU imports, including citrus products and other perishable goods, the absence of clear regulations has compounded operational difficulties. Karen Betts, Chief Executive of the Food & Drink Federation, emphasised the importance of collaboration between industry leaders and government to ensure the UK retains influence over EU regulatory developments that significantly impact the competitiveness of British businesses.

As uncertainty persists, many industry figures warn of additional economic consequences if clear strategies are not implemented promptly. The government faces mounting pressure to provide the consistency and support necessary to facilitate smoother trade operations and revive investor confidence in British agriculture and food production.