ESG Investment Funds Exposed to $14 Billion in Xinjiang Forced Labour Links

Thank you for visiting, don't forget to subscribe by following here if you enjoy our content. We use follow.it to give you maximum control over your news.

Global environmental, social and governance (ESG) funds have allocated a staggering £1.4 billion to companies with alleged connections to forced labour practices in China’s Xinjiang region, reveals a groundbreaking analysis by Ignites Asia.

The investigation uncovered that £1.1 billion of these sustainable investments are concentrated in Contemporary Amperex Technology (CATL), the world’s largest manufacturer of electric vehicle and energy storage batteries. This revelation raises serious questions about the due diligence processes of fund managers investing in Chinese supply chains.

The Republican-led US House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist party highlighted new evidence in June linking CATL to state-sponsored forced labour and human rights violations against Xinjiang minorities. These findings were bolstered by research from the Helena Kennedy Centre for International Justice, which expressed concerns about CATL’s 2022 expansion into the region.

Active global ESG funds hold £789 million in CATL investments, while passive funds contribute £263 million. Industry giants BlackRock, Nordea, and Ninety One emerge as the largest investors, with holdings of £148 million, £93 million, and £86 million respectively.

Industry experts argue that ESG funds investing in companies linked to forced labour undermines their fundamental purpose. Sam Goodman, senior policy director at China Strategic Risks Institute, emphasises that green investment should not compromise human rights, describing it as a “false economy” to suggest otherwise.

The situation is further complicated by China’s influence over asset managers, creating what Anita Dorett, director at the Investor Alliance for Human Rights, describes as a “chilling effect” that may deter divestment. She advocates for sector-wide action rather than individual company approaches to address these ethical concerns effectively.

Post Disclaimer

The following content has been published by Stockmark.IT. All information utilised in the creation of this communication has been gathered from publicly available sources that we consider reliable. Nevertheless, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this communication.

This communication is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer, recommendation, solicitation, inducement, or invitation by or on behalf of the Company or any affiliates to engage in any investment activities. The opinions and views expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Company, its affiliates, or any other third party.

The services and products mentioned in this communication may not be suitable for all recipients, by continuing to read this website and its content you agree to the terms of this disclaimer.