
Councils across the United Kingdom are facing a £4 billion financial black hole, despite an emergency government funding boost last year, according to new findings by Unison, the country’s largest public sector union. The persistent shortfall is fuelling widespread fears about further cuts to vital local services, with urgent calls for Chancellor Rachel Reeves to take decisive action in the autumn budget to safeguard community support.
Unison has highlighted the impact of fifteen years of stringent cuts, stressing that “no community has been left untouched” by austerity. Councils striving to balance their books have slashed crucial provisions, including social care and support for victims of sexual abuse. Increasing pressures from homelessness and surges in demand for both adult and child social care have left budgets stretched to their limits, forcing authorities to divert funds away from essential maintenance such as road repairs.
The funding gap, standing at £4.1 billion for the coming year, has barely shifted from last year’s £4.3 billion deficit. This worrying figure persists despite an emergency uplift of £1.3 billion delivered to local authorities at last year’s autumn budget. Labour’s additional funding has proved insufficient to stem the tide of council finances tipping towards bankruptcy, with at least 30 authorities requesting emergency financial support in the past twelve months alone. Such support often necessitates increased borrowing or the sale of council buildings.
Section 114 notices, issued by councils when forecasted income cannot meet expenditure, have become increasingly common. Once issued, councils are barred from committing to new spending and must formulate a recovery plan within three weeks. High-profile cases such as Birmingham, Croydon and Nottingham have brought this issue sharply into focus, with Birmingham alone labouring under nearly £800 million in equal pay liabilities.
Recent measures included Derbyshire county council closing eight care homes and five day centres, with more closures feared. Meanwhile, Cornwall council has axed programmes supporting children who have experienced online sexual exploitation or abuse. Industrial action is also on the rise, with more than 350 refuse workers in Birmingham striking over planned redundancies, causing notable disruption to local waste collection.
This year’s spending review offered an average annual funding rise of 2.6 per cent over three years, but hinges on authorities increasing council tax by just under five per cent—the maximum allowed without a public referendum. Most councils in England have already enacted the highest possible increases, pushing average annual council tax bills up by as much as £370 over the next four years. Despite a purported 6.8 per cent uplift in cash terms to a total of £69 billion for councils in England, experts like Professor Ashwin Kumar of the Institute for Public Policy Research argue that the system is outdated and in need of fundamental reform. Proposals under discussion include a move towards a proportional property tax and a higher rate for the most valuable homes, as well as an elevated surcharge on foreign buyers.
Unison General Secretary Christina McAnea insists that multi-year funding settlements are essential, enabling local authorities to move beyond short-term crisis management and deliver stability for workers and residents alike. With local government finances still in a perilous state, the sector awaits the next budget with mounting apprehension.
The following content has been published by Stockmark.IT. All information utilised in the creation of this communication has been gathered from publicly available sources that we consider reliable. Nevertheless, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this communication.
This communication is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer, recommendation, solicitation, inducement, or invitation by or on behalf of the Company or any affiliates to engage in any investment activities. The opinions and views expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Company, its affiliates, or any other third party.
The services and products mentioned in this communication may not be suitable for all recipients, by continuing to read this website and its content you agree to the terms of this disclaimer.






