
Ministers have been warned that taking control of Thames Water could add £16.8 billion to the UK’s debt, posing a significant challenge to Labour’s fiscal rules. This would complicate Rachel Reeves’ goal of ensuring debt reduction by 2028-29, a target with little room for manoeuvre as projections show the margin stands at just £15.1 billion.
The fiscal implications arise from the government’s “public-sector net financial liabilities” measure of debt. Under this framework, debts held by nationalised water companies, including heavily indebted firms like Thames Water, would be added to public liabilities without factoring in the value of the £90 billion in physical assets owned by the companies. Such moves risk eroding confidence among investors while constraining government borrowing capacity.
Thames Water has been pushing for an exemption from more than £1 billion in pollution fines. The company argues that the fines are deterring much-needed investment from creditors as it seeks a financial lifeline. Labour MPs have likened Thames Water’s negotiating tactics to “holding the government and taxpayers hostage.”
Adding to the complexity, many of Thames Water’s bondholders are financial institutions critical for investment in other public-sector infrastructure initiatives. Government officials have expressed concern that forcing these creditors to accept a “haircut” on their investments could undermine trust and discourage much-needed capital in other public projects.
Efforts to find solutions have been curtailed as the US private equity group KKR’s decision to pull out of a potential deal left bondholders as the only viable source of new financing. This leverage places bondholders in a stronger negotiating position, with government figures acknowledging the difficulty of forcing alternative outcomes without damaging investor relations.
The Office for Budget Responsibility has stressed that bringing water companies into public ownership would significantly increase public debt. Industry experts argue that the sheer scale of Thames Water’s liabilities complicates any nationalisation attempt, creating an intricate balancing act between achieving Labour’s fiscal rules and safeguarding the UK’s infrastructure investment environment.
The following content has been published by Stockmark.IT. All information utilised in the creation of this communication has been gathered from publicly available sources that we consider reliable. Nevertheless, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this communication.
This communication is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer, recommendation, solicitation, inducement, or invitation by or on behalf of the Company or any affiliates to engage in any investment activities. The opinions and views expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Company, its affiliates, or any other third party.
The services and products mentioned in this communication may not be suitable for all recipients, by continuing to read this website and its content you agree to the terms of this disclaimer.






