
Pension firms, insurers and international investors are cautioning the government that proposed leasehold reforms may jeopardise substantial investment in Britain unless ministers reconsider Labour’s commitment to overhaul the country’s ground rent regime. Keir Starmer has pledged to replace the current system for 4.8 million leasehold households with a commonhold approach and to present a draft bill before the end of the year. The planned legislation seeks to prevent sharp increases in ground rents by potentially capping them at £250 a year, a measure that would apply to existing agreements with years left to run.
The City has reiterated that applying such rules retrospectively could have significant repercussions for investment in future development projects and could cause financial losses for pension funds, which have invested £15 billion in ground rents as a reliable source of income. Estimates indicate freeholders might demand at least £27 billion in compensation, according to prior government impact assessments.
At least ten City institutions have warned the Treasury, supported by industry groups such as TheCityUK, the Investment Association and the Association of British Insurers. A FTSE 100-listed fund managed by Schroders that invests in ground rents is in the process of closing, reflecting concern in financial circles not just about past investments but also wider confidence in future projects.
John Godfrey, managing director of public affairs at TheCityUK, highlighted the risks of making contract changes with retrospective effect, emphasising this could undermine the United Kingdom’s reputation as a dependable rule-of-law investment environment. The ability of investors to trust in the inviolability of contracts is crucial for projects such as energy or transport infrastructure.
Chris Cummings of the Investment Association has reportedly shared industry concerns with the Chancellor, highlighting the potential implications for contracts across major sectors. The Association of British Insurers has stated that retrospective changes to property rights would set a troubling precedent, dissuade confidence in property rights, and increase the risk premiums attached to the UK, undermining the country’s appeal as a global capital destination.
The Treasury has long resisted ground rent caps, given the strength of financial sector opposition. Steve Reed, the housing secretary and Matthew Pennycook, the housing minister, are still expected to push for such a cap in Labour’s draft bill. Barry Gardiner, a senior Labour figure, warned that any concession would represent a substantial retreat in the party’s programme to prevent what he describes as continued exploitation of leaseholders.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government confirmed the government’s intent to legislate against unregulated ground rent charges, stating that additional details would be shared in due course.
The following content has been published by Stockmark.IT. All information utilised in the creation of this communication has been gathered from publicly available sources that we consider reliable. Nevertheless, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this communication.
This communication is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer, recommendation, solicitation, inducement, or invitation by or on behalf of the Company or any affiliates to engage in any investment activities. The opinions and views expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Company, its affiliates, or any other third party.
The services and products mentioned in this communication may not be suitable for all recipients, by continuing to read this website and its content you agree to the terms of this disclaimer.






