{"id":63420,"title":"New York mayor criticises Google over search access restrictions","publisher":"Stockmark.IT","author":"Stockmark.IT Website","published":"2026-11-09T05:48:05+00:00","modified":"2026-11-09T05:48:05+00:00","canonical_url":"https://stockmark.it/mamdani-blasts-google-for-using-monopoly-to-bully-schools-that-ban-ai/","markdown_url":"https://stockmark.it/mamdani-blasts-google-for-using-monopoly-to-bully-schools-that-ban-ai.md","json_url":"https://stockmark.it/mamdani-blasts-google-for-using-monopoly-to-bully-schools-that-ban-ai.json","category":"AI","categories":["AI","Google"],"featured_image":"https://i0.wp.com/stockmark.it/wp-content/uploads/2026/11/new-york-mayor-criticises-google-over-search-access.png?fit=1536%2C1024&quality=80&ssl=1","format":"news","language":"en-GB","content":"New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani has publicly criticised Google for its decision to restrict search engine access in schools that limit the use of artificial intelligence features. The mayor described the move as an attempt by the technology giant to leverage its market dominance to mandate AI adoption within the public education sector. In a statement posted on social media, Mamdani asserted that no corporation should possess the authority to dictate pedagogical methods or curricular decisions. He emphasised that the primary purpose of public schools is to serve the educational needs of students, rather than to enhance the profit margins of large technology companies.\n\nGoogle announced on Tuesday that it would disable AI features in its software for students unless school administrators explicitly opted to activate them. This change aligns with long-standing requests from educators who have sought greater control over AI tools in the classroom. However, the company introduced a significant condition to this policy. If a school district chooses to restrict all of Google’s AI capabilities, the company will simultaneously disable access to its standard search engine. Chris Phillips, Google’s vice president for education, provided a brief explanation to the New York Times, which first reported on the decision. Phillips stated that search and AI are deeply integrated, offering no further detail on the technical or commercial rationale behind the linkage.\n\nWhile the integration of AI into search results is technically accurate, the company’s vague explanation suggests a deliberate strategy rather than a purely technical limitation. Google’s search engine has increasingly incorporated AI features, a trend that accelerated following the recent boom in chatbot technology. Prior to this shift, AI algorithms were used to improve search results, but the platform still encouraged users to actively search for information. Even earlier features, such as featured snippets, quoted web pages directly and linked to original sources, reducing the risk of inaccurate information. The current approach, however, has evolved into a more chatbot-like experience.\n\nThe modern Google search interface now presents AI-generated summaries and chat windows at the top of the page. These features automatically synthesise lengthy answers to specific queries, presenting them with a sense of authority despite the known tendency of AI systems to generate inaccurate information. This shift reduces the incentive for users, particularly students, to verify sources or conduct independent research. Parents and educators express concern that this environment hinders the development of critical thinking skills and independent problem-solving abilities. The issue is compounded by the availability of full-fledged chatbot products, such as Google Gemini, which many school districts view with suspicion due to their potential to facilitate academic dishonesty.\n\nMamdani has prioritised the regulation of AI in education as a central part of his political agenda. In September, he announced a one-year moratorium on the use of AI in New York City classrooms, a policy he described as the most comprehensive of its kind in the country. Critics argue that Google’s current stance is particularly aggressive given its position as the dominant search engine and primary gateway to the internet for many users. A federal judge ruled in 2024 that Google held an illegal monopoly over the search engine market. Observers suggest that the company’s current strategy with schools mirrors this behaviour, potentially using its outsized bargaining power to ensure that the current generation of students becomes dependent on its AI ecosystem as future customers."}