
Markets are exhibiting complacency regarding the rising pressure on oil prices stemming from the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel, alongside the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Amrita Sen, a prominent energy analyst and founder of Energy Aspects, highlighted that hedge funds and asset managers may not fully grasp the far-reaching implications of this crisis on global energy markets.
The price of Brent crude soared to $84.5 last Thursday, driven by the escalation of hostilities in the region. Despite this increase, according to Sen, traders are puzzled as to why oil prices have not surged beyond the hundred-dollar mark per barrel. The misconception surrounding the availability of western nations’ stored oil further complicates the situation.
Sen pointed out that while significant oil inventories exist, much of this storage is concentrated in China. Recently, China announced it would not export its petrol and diesel to ensure sufficient domestic supplies. India has adopted a similar stance, reinforcing the notion that global supply dynamics are shifting significantly.
As the crisis unfolds, insurance and safety concerns have led to an estimated thousand vessels, including oil and gas tankers, remaining anchored in the Arabian Gulf. The increased freight rates are posing challenges for owners and charterers, who must now face the prospect of higher war insurance premiums. With petrol station queues visibly increasing, fears over prices and supply are becoming more pronounced.
Chris Wright, the US Secretary of Energy, suggested that the market impact from the conflict may be a manageable cost to achieve military goals. However, Kristalina Georgieva of the International Monetary Fund cautioned that the ongoing crisis is already testing the resilience of the global economy. Trevor Greetham, from Royal London Asset Management, noted the unusual stability in oil prices, despite market volatility.
Kpler, a trade and commodity data provider, opined that the conflict may remain contained and relatively short-lived. Iran’s missile capacity, along with the strategic importance of the Strait, reduces the likelihood of sustained disruption. However, Sen warned that even with a resumption of tanker movements, the process is not instantaneous, as many producers have ceased operations, requiring time to restart.
As refinery clients in Asia signal potential production closures in the event of continued impasse at the Strait, the need for Europe to reconsider its energy security has become clearer. The energy landscape is shifting, and rising prices may impact European markets the most significantly.
The following content has been published by Stockmark.IT. All information utilised in the creation of this communication has been gathered from publicly available sources that we consider reliable. Nevertheless, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this communication.
This communication is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer, recommendation, solicitation, inducement, or invitation by or on behalf of the Company or any affiliates to engage in any investment activities. The opinions and views expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Company, its affiliates, or any other third party.
The services and products mentioned in this communication may not be suitable for all recipients, by continuing to read this website and its content you agree to the terms of this disclaimer.






