
London’s commercial property sector has demonstrated remarkable resilience in recent years, with prime office rents climbing 46 per cent in the City since the pandemic. However, the emergence of artificial intelligence has prompted industry analysts to question whether this growth trajectory can be sustained, or whether the capital’s office market faces a contraction reminiscent of the dotcom crash two decades ago.
The early 2000s proved challenging for London’s office landlords. Following the dotcom bubble’s collapse, millions of square feet of space were vacated as corporate failures mounted. Office rents declined approximately 30 per cent from their late 2000 peaks, whilst valuations fell by roughly 25 per cent, even for premium buildings in the City and West End.
Mike Prew, a real estate analyst at Jefferies, recently published research suggesting artificial intelligence could trigger a comparable market downturn. His analysis estimated that 50,000 job losses in London attributable to AI, a figure comparable to post-dotcom redundancies, would equate to approximately a dozen Gherkin-sized buildings becoming vacant. Such an outcome, Prew argued, would exert significant downward pressure on both rental values and property valuations, consequently affecting major landlords’ share prices.
Analysts at Deutsche Bank subsequently acknowledged that second-order effects of artificial intelligence, particularly regarding tenant demand, have become a critical consideration for investors and property owners. The bank’s research team noted that AI’s capacity to automate white-collar functions, especially entry-level and back-office positions, presents genuine displacement risks. Nevertheless, they concluded any labour market disruption would likely prove gradual rather than immediate.
Industry landlords have adopted a markedly more optimistic perspective on AI’s implications for employment and, consequently, office demand. Nick Montgomery, head of UK real estate investment at Schroders, observed that previous technological advances have not eliminated white-collar employment. Historical experience suggests economies adapt to innovation, typically resulting in enhanced productivity and employment growth rather than widespread job losses.
Bradley Baker, chief executive of office developer CO-RE, drew parallels with earlier technological transitions. He recalled predictions of mass unemployment following the introduction of computers, which ultimately failed to materialise. Baker expressed confidence that artificial intelligence would similarly generate new opportunities, noting that innovation tends to create unexpected commercial applications and employment categories.
Stephen Down, chairman of Savills’ central London investment team, suggested the economic impact of AI would prove expansionary. The prevailing industry consensus holds that job losses in specific sectors will be offset by the creation of roles within emerging businesses pursuing activities currently difficult to envisage. Down highlighted Silicon Valley’s transformation over three decades as evidence of technology’s capacity to generate entirely new economic ecosystems.
Leasing activity already reflects this optimistic outlook. OpenAI, Anthropic and Sierra AI number among companies that have recently secured London premises or are actively seeking British operations bases. Mike Wiseman, head of campuses at British Land, reported overwhelming demand from AI-related businesses expanding within London. Chris Vydra, executive director at CBRE, noted that AI companies are arriving in Europe with substantially greater funding than dotcom-era ventures, with London consistently chosen ahead of Berlin or Paris for initial European operations.
Vydra characterised the previous year as the strongest for office leasing in his three-decade career, with similar performance anticipated for the current year. This demand surge, particularly concentrated on premium buildings in prime locations, has driven vacancy rates for top-tier City and West End offices below 1 per cent, compared with a long-term average of 7 to 8 per cent, according to Knight Frank data.
The scarcity of high-quality space, resulting from planning delays and elevated financing costs constraining new development, has enabled substantial rental growth. Knight Frank’s analysis indicates West End prime rents have risen 68 per cent over six years. Jo McNamara, head of Europe at Oxford Properties, observed that tenants currently display reduced price sensitivity, prioritising suitable space over cost considerations. Viewing activity and lease transactions have reached unusually high levels, supporting continued rental increases across premium locations.
The secondary office market, comprising older buildings in less advantageous locations, presents a starkly different picture. Montgomery characterised the office market as resembling a crème brûlée, with a hard surface of prime properties overlying considerably weaker secondary stock. McNamara suggested that for inferior buildings, pricing reductions offer limited competitive advantage.
Market participants anticipate artificial intelligence will accelerate the divergence between prime and secondary office performance. Assuming AI automates routine data collection and analysis functions, employees will increasingly focus on creative value generation from processed information. McNamara argued that offices facilitating creativity will command premium demand, reinforcing the advantages held by superior buildings.
Isabelle Scemama, global head of alternative investments at BNP Paribas Asset Management, has identified opportunities in this market bifurcation. Her team, responsible for major City developments including 22 Bishopsgate and the forthcoming 50 Fenchurch Street, considers building refurbishment more attractive than new construction. Scemama highlighted the difficulty of obtaining planning permission for new schemes in London and Paris, suggesting conversion of existing buildings represents the optimal strategy for capitalising on the shortage of well-located prime office space.
Despite analytical concerns regarding AI’s potential impact, landlords report minimal evidence of tenant anxiety affecting leasing decisions. Down confirmed he has encountered no conversations over the past twelve months suggesting occupiers believe AI threatens the office sector. Wiseman, drawing on discussions with British Land’s approximately 200 office tenants, has not identified any business seeking to reduce premises on the expectation of AI-enabled workforce reductions.
Wiseman noted a recurring pattern whereby media narratives diverge substantially from commercial reality. Following the Brexit referendum, banks reportedly relocating to Frankfurt subsequently confirmed their London commitment. Similarly, predictions of offices becoming obsolete post-pandemic proved unfounded as employers prioritised returning staff to physical workplaces. The current AI debate appears to follow this established pattern of pessimistic commentary preceding continued market strength.
The consensus among property professionals maintains that London offices will retain their centrality to business operations regardless of artificial intelligence’s ultimate trajectory. Whilst companies consider AI’s longer-term strategic implications, current leasing decisions remain unaffected by automation concerns. The capital’s office market continues to benefit from structural supply constraints in the prime segment, supporting rental growth and investment activity despite broader economic uncertainties.
The following content has been published by Stockmark.IT. All information utilised in the creation of this communication has been gathered from publicly available sources that we consider reliable. Nevertheless, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this communication.
This communication is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be construed as an offer, recommendation, solicitation, inducement, or invitation by or on behalf of the Company or any affiliates to engage in any investment activities. The opinions and views expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Company, its affiliates, or any other third party.
The services and products mentioned in this communication may not be suitable for all recipients, by continuing to read this website and its content you agree to the terms of this disclaimer.






